1. Definition : A request, actio or event resulting in an agreed CHANGE to
- Project delivery timescales, costs or price
- Agreed functionality or requirements(SOW)
- Contractual Conditions
- Payment Terms
- Penalties
- Customer Involvement
2.Typical Casation
- Contractually agreed commitment not being met by Customer
- Change in Requirements
- Poor effort estimation and planing
- Product Problems
- force Majeure
3. Things typically change dur to a Change Control
- Schedule -> Cash Flow-> Work Effort & Price ->Cost -> Revenue Recognition -> Contact Terms
4. Common Occurrences related to Change Contorl
- Customer keeps requesting & rejecting CC whilst refusing to pay for analysis
- Customer views payment for CC as " not in the spirit" of the project
- Sales wants to give CC free
- Customer believes the request/change is within Scope, ie not CC
- customer requests a CC that moves a milestone payment out
- Customer wants to reduce already agreed scope and believes reduced cost should be passed on to customer as other fuctions or reduction in price
- Customer does not believe the estimate is a accurate(already too high)
- Change is required on a Sub-contractors deliverable, the customer says it is within scope & will not pay and the Sun-Contractor say it is not within scope, OCS is in the middle.
- Acceptance Blackmail(ie No free Change Control then No Acceptance)
5. Rules for Managing Change Control
- Stay calm : if discussion becomes too heated on a given topic, move from the topic.
- Get all of the issues on the table and deal with them one by one but think holistically
- Allo Positions to be clarified : Allow the customer and OCS fuctional Analysts to give the technical case as to whether an item is in or out of scope.
- Deal Holisticall : When you have heard both sides, do not agree items one by one but rather wait until all items have been heard by both side.
6. How to make a "Reasoned Case"
- Constrct your argument in four level
- Contractual High Ground(Check it you have it)
- Moral High Ground(Do you have it)
- Mutual Culpability(Is the guilt balanced)
- Vible Threat(BANOC-Best Alternative to a Negotiated Outcome)
- Use the "Range" Argument to enumerate positions
- Use DEDUCTIVE and INDUCTIVE Agrumrns where appicable
- Allow the Opponent(Customer) to speak and complete their point
- Avoid burning bridges(relationship must not be lost)
- Deal one on one where possible(avoids group dynamics)
- Make it clear that it is not personal, we are both trying to do the right thing by our employers
- Never-Exaggerate or strect the truth
- Argue PRINCIPLE not DETAIL
No comments:
Post a Comment